The UFC - Is It Really That Dangerous

The legitimacy of mixed martial arts, identified by most as UFC fighting, has consistently been questioned and scrutinized since its inception in 1993. Many have mentioned that the brutal tactics utilized in combined martial arts are barbaric and abhorrent. A lot controversy has surrounded this new-age fighting type that even Senator John McCain entered the fray. The Senator made it his personal mission to get the UFC and blended martial arts preventing banned in America. Nevertheless, since his lack of ability to take action, MMA has been on the rise ever since.

As a result of so much hoopla, one question arises - Is MMA really that dangerous? Is this sport as primitive and disgusting as so many individuals claim? I imply, there's combating involved, however is it bad sufficient to warrant a nation extensive ban? I personally don't suppose so. And here's why.

Combined martial arts is just that - mixed. It is a conglomerate of many other forms of fighting. The UFC features fighters from wrestling, boxing, muay thai, jui jitsu and tae kwon do backgrounds. Nearly all of that are Olympic sports. So, ask yourself. If these sports are adequate to attract one of the best athletes from around the world to compete in an event that honors them as such, why shouldn't a sport that encompasses each of those styles be ok? The reply is it needs to be good enough and is.

Additionally, many individuals say that MMA and the UFC is dangerous because it teaches kids that combating is alright and even revered. However that argument holds absolutely no water at all. In the event you had been to ban something and everything violent, then you would need to ban skilled wrestling, video games and yes, our different beloved Olympic sports activities talked about above. However seeing as how society just isn't keen to give these things up, there is no such thing as a purpose to single MMA and the UFC 214 live out as the ugling duckling.

And last, but certainly not least, how is danger measured? I mean, poeple say that MMA is too dangerous, however what are they using to gauge that hazard?

Could it's injuries?

No, that's absurd. MMA fighters, hardly ever, if ever, maintain injuries. And when they do, the hospital keep is no longer than a day. Then again, injuries in sports activities as "harmless" as soccer and hockey occur every single day, leaving their athletes laid up in a hospital beds for months and generally years.

Might the hazard be measured by way of the number of yearly death caused by the game?

No, because so long as the UFC has been round, there have been no deaths. However, on the opposite facet of the token, deaths often happen in other main sports each year. For instance, in boxing, the "beautiful" and "creative" version of MMA, there have been approximately 900 deaths since 1920. That is a median of just below thirteen individuals a year. People say that those numbers have dropped considerably as the game has been made more safe. Properly, the identical will be stated in regards to the UFC. Every fight is ruled by the Nevada State Athletic Commission, the identical organization that governs boxing bouts. Additionally, the game has undoubtedly advanced since its inception. Now, unlike within the early days when it was pretty much no holds barred, the UFC has a long list of can's and cannot's - a list that has prevented major injury or dying in each single battle to date.

So, to say that MMA and the UFC are barbaric and overly dangerous is simply not true. The numbers converse for themselves. The fact that you could not just like the up-in-your-face, new-age model of combating that the UFC promotes is your problem. Folks did not like boxing at first either. Soccer, too, was considered harmful because of the dearth of padding and the leather helmets utilized in competition. However, like soccer, MMA has advanced into a protected and exciting sport.